Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan and its Resistant Sources in Chinese Cabbage

 

Xueyu Han1, Junlong Yin1,2, Ikram Ullah1, Enzhu Luo1 and Yanling Yue1*

1College of Landscape and Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

2Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Proving Ground, Danzhou 571737, China

*For correspondence: yanling-yue@126.com; 2217714953@qq.com

Contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors

Received 01 August 2020; Accepted 02 January 2021; Published 25 March 2021

 

Abstract

 

The Williams differential system was employed for pathotype identification of 34 Plasmodiophora brassicae root samples collected from Yunnan Province and pathotypes 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14 were detected. Pathotype 4 was dominant with 70.59% of all the samples in Yunnan. The distribution of the P. brassicae pathotypes was mapped. Resistance to P. brassicae (clubroot disease) was investigated in 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars and it was found that the cultivar Shangpin had multiple resistances and was immune while Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were resistant to P. brassicae. These cultivars can be used by farmers as sources of resistance to P. brassicae, to aid them in reducing disease in their crops. Seven known clubroot-resistant genes were detected in the 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars. CRa and CRb were found to be the most resistant to P. brassicae pathotype 4. Beisheng CR12 was resistant to pathotypes 1, 4, 10 and 14, but did not carry any known resistance genes, which indicated that unknown resistant genes were present. This study will lay the foundation for the control of clubroot disease and promote disease-resistant breeding of Chinese cabbage. © 2021 Friends Science Publishers

 

Keywords: Clubroot; Differential hosts; Plasmodiophora brassicae; Resistance identification

 


Introduction

 

Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae (P. brassicae), is an obligate parasitic soil-borne disease of plants causing 25–60% of yield losses in crucifer crops annually (Faggian et al. 1999; Howard et al. 2010; Suo et al. 2015). P. brassicae infects the roots, causing swelling or formation of galls on the roots. The distorted root reduces water and nutrient uptake and leaf heads fail to develop (Faggian et al. 1999). Clubroot was first reported in 1737 on the west coast of the Mediterranean Sea and southern Europe (Karling 1942). In Asia, it was first reported in Taiwan, China (1936) and then spread to Japan and Korea. At present, there are reports of clubroot occurrence in the Northeast, Southwest, Shandong and the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River in China (Suo et al. 2015). The resting spores of P. brassicae can survive for more than a decade within the soil (Karling 1942), even if the cruciferous crops were no longer cultivated. Once a suitable host is available for infection, the resting spores activate and invade the roots, and additional resting spores are released after root decomposition, thus threatening the sustainable production of cruciferous vegetables (Fei et al. 2015). Some measures have been taken to control this pathogen in infested fields. Crop rotation is commonly used to prevent the spread of clubroot disease (Howard et al. 2010), however, this method is not a practical way to eradicate spores (Peng et al. 2015). Soil amendments with lime have also been considered as an effective management strategy to reduce clubroot infestation, by increasing soil pH (Lv et al. 2018). However, the repetitive use of lime destroys the soil structure, ultimately affecting sustainable production (Webster and Dixon 1991). Fluazinam, a synthetic fungicide, has been shown to control P. brassicae (Howard et al. 2010; Yuan et al. 2016), however, improper use of the soil and plant residues greatly affects human health and environmental safety (Lee et al. 2012). Endophytic actinomycetes isolated from the roots of Chinese cabbage can effectively control clubroot (Lee et al. 2008), but the activity against P. brassicae is susceptible to soil environmental conditions, and their field efficacy is inconsistent and often ineffective (Saravanan et al. 2003; Mcgrann et al. 2017). Wang et al. (2016) found that the Streptomyces albospinus CT205, proved to be effective in preventing clubroot disease, although environmental and climatic factors severely affect its performance. Biocontrol agents are expensive and, if not applied properly, can lead to an increased production cost. Therefore, the application of resistant varieties is considered to be one of the most effective and environmentally friendly approaches for treating clubroot disease.

Clubroot has been present in Yunnan for approximately 30 years. It first appeared in the Chenggong area of Kunming and has been identified in Chuxiong, Yuxi, Qujing, Dali, and other areas. Yunnan is the main vegetable producing area in China, and Chinese cabbage is an important export vegetable of Yunnan Province, cultivated in an area of approximately 100 000 hm2 with a yield of 4.06 million. The soil contaminated by P. brassicae in the main production regions accounts for approximately 20% of the total area and the loss of crops is generally 20–40%, but can be up to 100%. Several resistant Chinese cabbage varieties, such as CR Huimin, Kanggen 51 and Tiejia No.1, have been developed and introduced (Tan and Yue 2013; Yin et al. 2018), although these studies are mostly directed at a single P. brassicae pathotype and a single sampling site, lacking comprehensive evaluation of pathotype differentiation, variety resistance and a suitable applied range in the province. In order to fully understand the distribution of clubroot in Yunnan Province, P. brassicae samples were collected from 34 different clubroot growing areas in 20172019 and their pathotypes and resistant cultivars of Chinese cabbage were identified, which would provide useful information for farmers to prevent and control clubroot.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Plant pathogen materials

 

A total of 34 P. brassicae samples were collected from the main cruciferous vegetable growing areas in Yunnan Province. The samples, along with collection sites and hosts, are shown in Table 1. For pathotype identification of the 34 P. brassicae samples, the hosts proposed by Williams, including two cabbage cultivars Jersey Queen (JQ), Badger Shipper (BS) and two turnip cultivars Laurentian (LT), Wilhelmsburger (WB), were obtained from the Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. Twenty-one Chinese cabbage-resistant varieties and the susceptible control variety 83-1were purchased from markets.

 

Preparation of the pathogen, plant inoculation and disease assessment

 

Resting spores were extracted from samples of P. brassicae using the method described by Zheng et al. (2019). The peat and resting spores were mixed evenly, with 1×107 spores per gram of pathogen soil. Peat, perlite, and vermiculite with a volume ratio of 2:1:1 were mixed and packed in seedling plugs with 72 holes, and 1.0 grams of pathogen soil was added to each hole. Germinated seeds of Williams’ identified hosts, and 22 Chinese cabbage varieties were sowed on pathogen soil, one seed per hole, and one seedling plug per variety. They were fertilised with Hoagland nutrient solution in the greenhouse (average night temperature 18°C and average day temperature 25°C). After 40 days of inoculation, pathotypes of 34 P. brassicae were identified according to the resistant and susceptible responses by Williams’ hosts (Williams 1996). The severity of the club development on each plant was rated using a scale of 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, according to The Grading Standard for Clubroot Resistance of Brassicaceae Crop Seedling Period, where 0 = no clubbing, 1 = one or a few small clubs on the lateral roots, 3 = clubs on the main roots with diameters less than 2 times that of the stem base, 5 = clubs on the main roots with diameters 2–3 times that of the stem base, 7 = clubs on the main roots, with diameters 3–4 times that of the stem base, and 9 = clubs on the main roots with diameters more than four times that of the stem base, or the swollen root is blackening. The index of disease (ID) was calculated using the following formula:

 

ID (%) = ∑ (n×0+n×1+n×3+n×5+n×7+n×9)/(N×9) ×100

 

where n is the number of plants in each class, N is the total number of plants, and 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 are the symptom severity classes.

 

DNA extraction and primer design

 

The Plant DNA Extraction Kit (http://www.bioteke.com/) was used to extract DNA from the leaves of 22 Chinese cabbage varieties and 4 Williams’ hosts, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers for disease-resistant genes were designed based on published molecular marker sequences of CR loci: Crr1 (Suwabe et al. 2003), Crr2 (Suwabe et al. 2003), Crr3 (Hirai et al. 2004), CRa (Ueno et al. 2012), CRb (Hatakeyama et al. 2013), CRc (Ueno et al. 2012) and CRk (Ueno et al. 2012). The list of primers used is listed in Table 2.

 

PCR reaction procedure and gel electrophoresis

 

Each locus was amplified with 2 ng of template DNA in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 1 μL of each primer and 12.5 μL of 2× PCR master mix (Takara, Japan). Thermal cycling conditions comprised denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30s, annealing temperature of each primer at 61°C, 55.5°C, 55.5°C, 54.5°C, 57°C, 52.2°C, 49°C, 47°C for 30s and extension at 72°C for 30s followed by extension at 72°C for 5 min in a BioTeke GeneAmp PCR system. Amplified PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer, stained with EB (ethidium bromide) and photographed.

 

Results

 

Identification of pathotypes

 

Table 1: Sampling codes, site and hosts of 34 Plasmodiophora brassicae samples

 

Code

Site

Hosts

Code

Site

Hosts

Code

Site

Hosts

Code

Site

Hosts

P1

Songming

Chinese cabbage

P2

Songming

Chinese cabbage

P3

Yingjiang

Chinese cabbage

P4

Yuxi

Chinese cabbage

P5

Panlong

Chinese cabbage

P6

Lufeng

Chinese cabbage

P7

Yaoan

Chinese cabbage

P8

Nanhua

Chinese cabbage

P9

Chenggong

Chinese cabbage

P10

Yingjiang

Chinese cabbage

P11

Jianshui

Chinese cabbage

P12

Jianshui

Chinese cabbage

P13

Ludian

Chinese cabbage

P14

Yiliang

Brassica oleracea

P15

Yiliang

Chinese cabbage

P16

Luliang

Chinese cabbage

P17

Luliang

Chinese cabbage

P18

Qujing

Chinese cabbage

P19

Dali

Chinese cabbage

P20

Luquan

Chinese cabbage

P21

Ludian

Chinese cabbage

P22

Ludian

Chinese cabbage

P23

Xundian

Cauliflower

P24

Luliang

Brassica oleracea

P25

Anning

Cauliflower

P26

Wuding

Chinese cabbage

P27

Shilin

Chinese cabbage

P28

Jinning

Chinese cabbage

P29

Fumin

Chinese cabbage

P30

Xishan

Chinese cabbage

P31

Weishan

Chinese cabbage

P32

Tonghai

Chinese cabbage

P33

Xuanwei

Chinese cabbage

P34

Qiubei

Chinese cabbage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Primers used for detection of clubroot resistant genes

 

Locus

Primer name

Primer sequences

Product size/bp

References

Crr1

BRMS-088-FW

BRM-088-RV

TATCGGTACTGATTCGCTCTTCAAC  ATCGGTTGTTATTTGAGAGCAGATT

R263/S233

(Suwabe et al. 2003).

Crr2

BRMS-096-FW

BRMS-096-RV

AGTCGAGATCTCGTTCGTGTCTCCC    TGAAGAAGGATTGAAGCTGTTGTTG

R220/S189

(Suwabe et al. 2003).

Crr3

OPC11-2F

OPC11-2R

GTAACTTGGTACAGAACAGCATAG

ACTTGTCTAATGAATGATCATGG

R1300/S1000

(Hirai et al. 2004).

CRa

SC2930-T-FW

SC2930-Q-FW

SC2930-RV

TAGACCTTTTTTTTGTCTTTTTTTTTAC

CAGACTAGACTTTTTGTCATTTAGA

CTAAGGCCATAGAAATCAGGTC

R800

S800

(Ueno et al. 2012).

CRb

KBrH129J18R-FW

KBrH129J18R-RV

AGAGCAGAGTGAAACCAGAACT

GTTTCAGTTCAGTCAGGTTTTTGCAG

R254/S194

(Hatakeyama et al. 2013).

CRc

B50-C9-FW

B50-6R-FW

B50-RV

GATTCAATGCATTTCTCTCGAT

AATGC ATTTTCGCTC AACC

CGTATT ATATC TCTTT CTCCA TCCC

R800

S800

(Ueno et al. 2012).

CRk

HC688-4-FW

HC688-6-RV

HC688-7-RV

TCTCTG TATTGCGTTGACTG

ATATGTTGAAGCCTATGTCT

AAATATATGTGAAGTCTTATG ATC

R1000

S1000

(Ueno et al. 2012).

 

Table 3: Resistant and susceptible response (severity based on a disease index, DI) of Williams’ differential hosts to collections of Plasmodiophora brassicae from Yunnan Province, China

 

Code

Williams hosts and disease index

Pathotypes

Code

Williams hosts and disease index

Pathotypes

JQ

DI

BS

DI

LT

DI

WB

DI

JQ

DI

BS

DI

LT

DI

WB

DI

P1

+

44

+

16

+

50

+

11

4

P18

+

13

+

26

+

7

-

0

2

P2

+

21

+

33

+

28

+

30

4

P19

+

36

+

15

+

20

+

11

4

P3

+

85

+

44

+

41

+

54

4

P20

-

0

+

11

-

0

+

11

14

P4

+

26

+

61

+

11

+

35

4

P21

+

12

+

11

+

16

+

11

4

P5

+

56

+

74

+

59

+

42

4

P22

+

32

+

17

+

41

+

39

4

P6

+

19

+

31

+

40

-

0

2

P23

+

17

+

11

-

0

+

35

10

P7

+

26

+

44

+

47

+

22

4

P24

+

23

+

21

+

22

+

42

4

P8

+

31

+

34

+

46

+

19

4

P25

+

20

+

20

+

13

+

13

4

P9

+

31

+

11

+

19

+

35

4

P26

+

44

+

24

+

48

+

42

4

P10

+

40

+

35

+

27

+

17

4

P27

+

40

+

11

-

0

+

11

10

P11

+

26

+

32

+

26

+

42

4

P28

+

43

+

17

+

11

+

18

4

P12

+

20

+

22

+

12

+

19

4

P29

+

28

+

46

+

34

+

38

4

P13

+

7

+

11

-

0

+

35

10

P30

+

20

+

20

+

15

+

23

4

P14

+

21

-

0

+

21

+

21

1

P31

+

38

+

19

-

0

+

27

10

P15

+

15

+

15

+

22

+

24

4

P32

+

30

+

50

+

13

+

18

4

P16

-

0

+

11

-

0

+

11

14

P33

+

19

+

22

+

12

+

16

4

P17

+

25

+

24

-

0

+

4

10

P34

+

21

+

18

+

14

+

17

4

Note: “+” represents susceptible reaction, “-” represents resistant reaction

JQ, BS, LT, and WB are Williams hosts (Jersey Queen, Badger Shipper, Laurentian, Wilhelmsburger). P1-P34 are the 34 P. brassicae samples. “Pathotypes”: the identified result of Pathotypes

 

The total collection of 34 P. brassicae isolates was assessed. The susceptible or resistant responses of Williams’ hosts to P. 图片2

 

Fig. 1: Amplification results of different resistant genes

Note: M: Marker DL2000; 14: Williams Identification Hosts Badger Shipper, Jersey Queen, Wilhelmsburger, Laurentian; 5: CK cultivars 83-1; 626: cultivars Chunqiushengen, CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao, Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King, CR mogen, Xinkanggen, CR gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin CR523. A, B, C, (D, E), F, (G, H), (I, J): amplification results of Crr1 (BRMS-088), Crr2 (BRMS-096), Crr3 (OPC11-2), CRa (SC2930-T, SC2930-Q), CRb (KBrH129J18R), CRc (B50-C9, B50-6R), CRk (HC688-6, HC688-7) respectively. The product size of resistant and susceptible is shown in Table 3

 

微信图片_20210101100142

 

Fig. 2: Distribution of pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan

 

brassicae are shown in Table 3. The 34 P. brassicae could be classified into five pathotypes: pathotypes 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14. Among them, 24 samples were pathotype 4, accounting for 70.59% of the total samples (Table 3). The results indicated that pathotype 4 was the predominant pathotype in Yunnan Province. All the Williams’ hosts (JQ, BS, LT and WS) were susceptible to P. brassicae of pathotype 4, which confirmed that this variety had the strongest pathogenicity of those studied.

The disease index of hosts JQ, BS, LT and WS differed after inoculation with pathotype 4. The disease index of JQ was 12 in P21 but reached 85 in P3, whereas the disease index of BS was 11 in P9 and P21, but 74 in P5. Similarly, the results for LT ranged from 11 to 59 and the disease index of WS ranged from 11 to 54 for pathotype 4. This shows pathogenic diversity among P. brassicae of pathotype 4 in Yunnan Province. The disease index of hosts was higher in P3 and P5 than in others, indicating that the pathogenicity of P3 and P5 was stronger than that of other P. brassicae of pathotype 4.

 

Diseases reaction of Chinese cabbage cultivars

 

We assessed the disease responses of 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars to 34 P. brassicae isolates (Table 4). The control variety (83-1) showed the typical clubroot symptoms with all P. brassicae isolates, which indicates that the method of inoculation was suitable. The other 21 Chinese cabbage varieties exhibited different resistance responses to the 34 P. brassicae isolates. Shangpin was immune to each of the 34 collections, whereas the disease index of Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were less than 10, indicating strong resistance. From the resistance expression of cultivars to pathotype 4, there were only three cultivars namely Shangpin, Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 that were immune to P5, less than the other varieties included in pathotype 4, which shows that P5 was a stronger version of P. brassicae. There were few sources which showed resistance to P5.

As shown in Table 4, CR8, CR9, CR10, CR17, CR18 and CR21 expressed immunity to P14 (pathotype 1). The disease indices of CR2, CR3, CR5, CR13, CR14 and CR16 were lower than 10, indicating that they were resistant to P14. CR17, CR18 and CR21 exhibited immunity, while CR1 and CR10 were resistant to P6 and P18 (pathotype 2). CR9, CR17, CR18 and CR21 were immune, and CR12 and CR16 were resistant to P13, P17, P23, P27 and P31 (pathotype 10). CR9, CR13, CR14, CR16, CR17, CR18, CR19 and CR21 showed immunity, and CR1 and CR8 were resistant to P16 and P20 (pathotype 14).

 

Molecular markers for resistance

 

To investigate the relationship between the clubroot-resistant varieties and known CR resistance loci, PCR amplification of the seven known molecular markers was applied for genotyping Williams’ hosts and the 22 cultivars.

The results (Fig. 1, Table 5) indicated that LT contained the most disease-resistant genes: Crr3, CRa, CRb, CRc and CRk. WB contained three disease-resistant genes: CRa, CRb and CRk. Only the resistant gene CRk was detected in the BS and JQ. Among the 21 tested varieties, CR18 and CR21 contained four disease-resistant genes, heterozygous CRa and CRk, homozygous CRb and CRc, which accounted for 9.52% of the total tested varieties. CR17 was checked for three disease-resistant genes, homozygous CRa, CRb and heterozygous CRk, which accounted for 4.76%. CR5 was examined for two resistant genes, homozygous Crr2 and heterozygous CRk, accounting for 4.76%. CR15 contained two resistant genes, heterozygous CRa and CRk, which accounted for 4.76%, and CR7, CR9 and CR11 did not test for any disease-resistant genes, accounting for 14.29% of the total tested cultivars. The other cultivars contained only one heterozygous CRk gene (61.9%).

 

Discussion

 

There are few reports related to the study of pathotype differentiation of P. brassicae in China, and only a few pathotypes have been detected, such as pathotype 4 in areas of Shandong and Jilin Province and pathotypes 2, 4 and 11 in the Liaoning area (Shen et al. 2009). Pathotypes 7 and 11 have been reported in the Sichuan area (Chen et al. 2016), and pathotypes 1, 4, 9 and 13 in the Hunan area (Peng et al. 2013). The clubroot in the Shandong, Jilin, Liaoning, Sichuan, and Hunan areas could be explained by the cultivation of resistant varieties. In this study, 5 pathotypes, pathotype 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14, were investigated in Yunnan Province and only Shangpin was determined as immune to all pathotypes, indicating that P. brassicae in Yunnan is more complex and pathogenic than in other areas in China. Pathotypes of P. brassicae and their distribution in Yunnan are shown in Fig. 2.

Table 4: Resistant and susceptible response (severity based on a disease index, DI) of 22 differential varieties to collections of Plasmodiophora brassicae from Yunnan Province, China

 

Varieties

83-1

CR1

CR2

CR3

CR4

CR5

CR6

CR7

CR8

CR9

CR10

CR11

CR12

CR13

CR14

CR15

CR16

CR17

CR18

CR19

CR20

CR21

P1

DI

61

0

4

0

43

16

10

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

17

2

0

0

0

12

1

R

S

I

R

I

S

S

S

I

I

I

I

R

I

I

I

S

R

I

I

I

S

R

P2

DI

57

31

4

5

70

5

15

11

0

0

0

52

0

2

0

57

11

0

0

2

23

5

R

S

S

R

R

S

R

S

S

I

I

I

S

I

R

I

S

S

I

I

R

S

R

P3

DI

85

19

57

9

43

33

41

0

0

0

1

43

0

19

5

49

32

0

0

13

0

0

R

S

S

S

R

S

S

S

I

I

I

R

S

I

S

R

S

S

I

I

S

I

I

P4

DI

72

25

42

52

58

15

35

17

0

0

0

30

11

7

10

56

17

0

0

38

14

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

I

S

S

R

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P5

DI

86

26

41

31

37

79

19

43

31

31

33

50

30

31

33

48

50

0

0

46

54

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P6

DI

65

3

20

11

65

14

28

32

38

48

0

11

17

10

27

80

27

0

0

19

25

0

R

S

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P7

DI

80

33

78

19

62

56

19

39

20

4

0

10

0

1

27

48

46

0

0

11

15

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

R

I

S

I

R

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P8

DI

67

17

26

0

41

48

22

0

0

8

2

53

23

0

0

27

27

0

0

13

12

0

R

S

S

S

I

S

S

S

I

I

R

R

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P9

DI

56

11

26

17

59

33

19

56

19

16

20

4

0

0

36

11

23

0

0

35

28

2

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

R

I

I

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

R

P10

DI

72

4

9

2

46

16

16

32

0

38

0

29

33

6

7

41

26

0

0

31

13

0

R

S

R

R

R

S

S

S

S

I

S

I

S

S

R

R

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P11

DI

65

1

19

0

47

28

23

42

17

22

1

15

19

0

0

70

7

0

0

7

7

0

R

S

R

S

I

S

S

S

S

S

S

R

S

S

I

I

S

R

I

I

R

R

I

P12

DI

76

9

13

0

31

29

0

21

0

4

0

29

37

4

11

51

4

0

0

0

36

0

R

S

R

S

I

S

S

I

S

I

R

I

S

S

R

S

S

R

I

I

I

S

I

P13

DI

37

5

22

7

69

6

8

8

0

0

2

17

0

0

9

32

6

0

0

0

13

0

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

R

R

I

I

R

S

I

I

R

S

R

I

I

I

S

I

P14

DI

46

19

7

2

63

8

17

25

0

0

0

37

11

1

5

50

2

0

0

17

15

0

R

S

S

R

R

S

R

S

S

I

I

I

S

S

R

R

S

R

I

I

S

S

I

P15

DI

57

19

7

2

63

8

17

25

19

0

0

37

11

1

5

50

2

0

0

17

6

0

R

S

S

R

R

S

R

S

S

S

I

I

S

S

R

R

S

R

I

I

S

R

I

P16

DI

67

8

19

0

72

11

14

22

2

0

26

26

0

0

0

40

0

0

0

0

25

0

R

S

R

S

I

S

S

S

S

R

I

S

S

I

I

I

S

I

I

I

I

S

I

P17

DI

70

39

65

21

78

44

69

36

37

0

10

44

3

19

20

46

5

0

0

13

15

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

S

S

R

S

S

S

R

I

I

S

S

I

P18

DI

44

7

63

5

12

12

4

0

0

1

7

20

2

2

0

45

0

0

0

7

16

0

R

S

R

S

R

S

S

R

I

I

R

R

S

R

R

I

S

I

I

I

R

S

I

P19

DI

65

22

13

4

54

18

1

4

0

0

0

26

3

0

6

20

1

0

0

3

0

0

R

S

S

S

R

S

S

R

R

I

I

I

S

R

I

R

S

R

I

I

R

I

I

P20

DI

67

8

19

11

72

0

8

22

2

0

26

26

11

0

0

40

0

0

0

0

25

0

R

S

R

S

S

S

I

R

S

R

I

S

S

S

I

I

S

I

I

I

I

S

I

P21

DI

22

39

70

17

61

14

23

0

6

31

0

21

9

0

3

61

34

0

0

19

33

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

R

S

I

S

R

I

R

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P22

DI

72

2

27

28

67

44

14

36

20

27

0

42

0

0

0

61

15

0

0

50

17

0

R

S

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

S

I

I

I

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P23

DI

37

5

22

7

69

6

8

8

0

0

2

17

0

0

9

32

6

0

0

0

13

0

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

R

R

R

I

R

S

I

I

R

S

R

I

I

I

S

I

P24

DI

67

24

37

29

33

5

13

7

0

8

0

0

12

6

0

57

19

0

3

32

61

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

R

S

R

I

R

I

I

S

R

I

S

S

I

R

S

S

I

P25

DI

33

28

0

1

22

17

2

11

0

0

0

19

0

0

0

28

0

0

0

11

6

0

R

S

S

I

R

S

S

R

S

I

I

I

S

I

I

I

S

I

I

I

S

R

I

P26

DI

65

11

14

15

52

9

32

0

0

21

3

2

0

14

0

48

19

0

0

11

32

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

R

S

I

I

S

R

R

I

S

I

S

S

I

I

S

S

I

P27

DI

57

31

24

4

56

12

1

4

0

0

3

26

0

0

4

24

1

0

0

0

3

0

R

S

S

S

R

S

S

R

R

I

I

R

S

I

I

R

S

R

I

I

I

R

I

P28

DI

56

39

46

21

78

44

16

36

37

1

10

44

3

19

20

46

5

0

5

15

13

0

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

R

S

S

R

S

S

S

R

I

R

S

S

I

P29

DI

63

3

20

17

37

21

17

16

39

32

3

15

5

15

10

59

23

0

1

36

36

0

R

S

R

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

R

S

R

S

S

S

S

I

R

S

S

I

P30

DI

52

6

42

5

12

12

16

0

0

1

7

20

2

2

0

45

0

0

0

16

17

0

R

S

R

S

R

S

S

S

I

I

R

R

S

R

R

I

S

I

I

I

S

S

I

P31

DI

46

16

34

5

58

14

8

7

0

0

7

29

0

0

6

44

3

0

0

0

16

0

R

S

S

S

R

S

S

R

R

I

I

R

S

I

I

R

S

R

I

I

I

S

I

P32

DI

73

16

63

2

62

24

9

7

0

0

0

23

12

1

34

58

5

0

0

7

9

0

R

S

S

S

R

S

S

R

R

I

I

I

S

S

R

S

S

R

I

I

R

R

I

P33

DI

35

22

8

3

18

13

5

14

2

0

3

25

0

0

0

36

0

0

0

15

4

0

R

S

S

R

R

S

S

R

S

R

I

R

S

I

I

I

S

I

I

I

S

R

I

P34

DI

38

26

4

7

24

19

3

12

1

0

5

17

0

0

0

27

0

0

0

12

9

0

R

S

S

R

R

S

S

R

S

R

I

R

S

I

I

I

S

I

I

I

S

R

I

Note: Disease index<10 meaned Resistant (R), Disease index≥10 meaned susceptible (S), Disease index=0 meaned immune (I). From CR1 to CR21: Chunqiushenggen, CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao, Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King, CR Mogen, Xinkanggen, CR Gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin CR523

 

Clubroot disease was detrimental in Kunming and its surrounding areas, Fumin, Anning, Jinning, Songming and Yiliang. Kunming became a disease centre, spreading outward to some areas of Chuxiong, Dali, Dehong, Lijiang, Honghe and Qujing, and to counter this expansion, we propose prevention and control strategies for clubroot disease in Yunnan Province. Although planting disease-resistant Chinese cabbage varieties or non-cruciferous crops in clubroot disease areas can reduce the number of P. brassicae spores in the soil and avoid the occurrence of clubroot, we need to invoke quarantine and disinfection of the seeds and seedlings in the adjacent areas of the disease area, avoiding soil pollution caused by P. brassicae from clubroot disease areas and preventing the expansion of the disease.

Table 5: Identification results of molecular markers

 

Code

Cultivars

Resistant site

Crr1

Crr2

Crr3

CRa

CRb

CRc

CRk

1

BS

\

-

\

-

-

\

+

2

JQ

\

-

\

-

-

\

+

3

WB

\

-

-

±

+

-

+

4

LT

-

-

+

±

+

+

+

5

83-1CK

-

\

-

-

-

-

+

6

CR1

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

7

CR2

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

8

CR3

\

-

-

-

-

-

±

9

CR4

-

\

-

-

-

-

±

10

CR5

-

+

-

-

-

-

±

11

CR6

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

12

CR7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

13

CR8

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

14

CR9

\

-

-

-

-

-

-

15

CR10

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

16

CR 11

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17

CR12

\

-

-

-

-

-

±

18

CR13

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

19

CR14

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

20

CR15

-

-

-

±

-

-

±

21

CR16

\

-

-

-

-

-

±

22

CR17

-

-

-

+

+

-

±

23

CR18

-

-

-

+

+

+

±

24

CR19

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

25

CR20

-

-

-

-

-

-

±

26

CR21

-

-

-

+

+

+

±

Note: “+” Homozygous persistent site; “-” Homozygous susceptible site; “±” Heterozygous resistant site; “\” no site. From CR1 to CR21: Chunqiushenggen, CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao, Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King, CR Mogen, Xinkanggen, CR Gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin CR523

 

Table 6: Resistance varieties of different Pathotypes

 

Race

Cultivars

Race 1

Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, ShangpinCR523

Race 2

Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Shangpin CR523

Race 4

Shangpin

Race 10

Beisheng CR12, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Shangpin CR523

Race 14

Beisheng CR12, CR Gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Shenggen NO.1, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, Shangpin CR523

 

The pathogenicity of P. brassicae in Yunnan Province has changed over the past decade. The P. brassicae found in Lufeng was pathotype 12 in 2013 (Liu et al. 2013), but is now pathotype 2. Both of the 2 P. brassicae samples from Songming were pathotype 4 in our study, but pathotype 7 was identified in 2016 (Chen et al. 2016). Pathotype 2 had higher pathogenicity than 12, and pathotype 4 was higher than pathotype 7. These results indicate that clubroot disease in Lufeng and Songming had become more robust over time. Pathogenicity of pathotype 4 was the highest among all pathotypes. However, only 3 cultivars: Shangpin, Shangpin CR523 and Shangpin CR527, were resistant to all types of pathotype 4 in Yunnan; the other varieties expressed either immune, resistant or susceptible responses depending on the type of pathogen 4. The responses of the same cultivar to 24 samples of pathotype 4 were different, which indicated its pathogenicity differences and complexity. It was reported by Li et al. (2012) that they had successfully isolated several pathotypes (2, 4, 8 and 11) from pathotype 4 samples in Shenyang Province by separating single resting spores. Their results led to the assumption that pathotype 4 samples in Yunnan may be composed of different types of P. brassicae. At present, these types cannot be clearly distinguished using the Williams system. Therefore, a more accurate identification method is crucial for the prevention and control of clubroot, and for clubroot-resistant breeding.

The application of resistant varieties is the most economical, effective and sustainable measure for the control of clubroot. In this study, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were immune to pathotypes 1, 2, 10 and 14 of P. brassicae, however, only Shangpin was immune to all of the types of pathotype 4 of P. brassicae (Table 6). These results provide a reference for the selection of Chinese cabbage cultivars in the clubroot disease area of Yunnan Province. They could also provide germplasm for the breeding of clubroot-resistant Chinese cabbage.

Some molecular markers of clubroot resistance have been identified. CRa and CRb are alleles or closely linked disease resistance loci on the A03 chromosome (Kato et al. 2012; Hatakeyama et al. 2017). Chinese cabbage with CRa and CRb could be resistant to pathotype 4 of P. brassicae (Saravanan et al. 2003) CRa and CRb loci were detected in Shangpin, Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 in this study. Shangpin, was only detected in three resistant markers. These three markers were also detected in Shangpin CR523 and Shangpin CR527, but their resistance was lower, indicating that there are still undiscovered resistance sites in Shangpin, and need further research. According to Sakamoto et al. (2008), Crr3 and CRk are two independent resistance loci on chromosome A03, with a genetic distance of 7 cM. However, in this experiment, the two resistance loci were quite different. The Crr3 locus was not detected in the 21 tested varieties, but CRk loci were widely detected, even in the susceptible control ‘83-1’. It is suspected that CRk loci may not be closely related to disease resistance genes.

Beisheng CR12 (CR9) was immune to P1-P4, P12-P17, P22, P23, P25, P27 and P31-P34, relating to pathotypes 1, 4, 10 and 14 (Table 3), but did not carry any known resistance genes (Table 5), indicating that unknown resistant genes were present. Beisheng CR12 would be a potential genetic resource for developing resistant markers or genes to prevent clubroot.

 

Conclusion

 

P. brassicae was more complex and pathogenic in Yunnan than in other areas of China. The two different strategies and three cultivars were suggested to prevent and control clubroot. Further studies are needed to find the potential genes resistant-clubroot in cultivars Beisheng CR12 and Shangpin.

 

Acknowledgements

 

This work was supported financially by the Key Research and Development Project of Yunnan Province (No. 2018BB021). We are thankful to the Vegetable Industry Technology System Experimental Stations in Jianshui, Dehong, Tonghai, Luliang, Kunming and Ludian for collection of P. brassicae root samples.

 

Author Contributions

 

Designed the experiments: YLY. Performed the experiments: JLY, XYH and EZL.Analyzed the data: XYH and JLY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: IU and EZL. Wrote the paper: XYH and YLY.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

We, the authors, declare no conflict of interest of any kind among ourselves of the institutions where the work was done

 

Data Availability Declaration

 

All data reported in this article are available with the corresponding author and will be produced on demand

 

References

 

Chen J, XS Ren, HY Song, CQ Li, TC Yuan, J Si (2016). Identification of races of Plasmodiophora brassicae from four different regions and resistance identification of new cabbage cross combinations. J Southwest Univ 38:67‒72

Faggian R, SR Bulman, AC Lawrie, IJ Porter (1999). Specific polymerase chain reaction primers for the detection of Plasmodiophora brassicae in soil and water. Phytopathology 89:392397

Fei WX, SF Wang, BC Hu, QS Li, SM Hou, SB Rong, XY Wu (2015). Control effect of different fungicides on clubroot and yield loss caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in Brassica napus. Plant Prot 41:201204

Hatakeyama K, T Niwa, T Kato, T Ohara, T Kakizaki, S Matsumoto (2017). The tandem repeated organization of NBLRR genes in the clubroot-resistant CRb locus in Brassica rapa L. Mol Genet Genomics 292:397405

Hatakeyama K, K Suwabe, RN Tomita, T Kato, T Nunome, H Fukuoka, S Matsumoto (2013). Identification and characterization of Crr1a, a gene for resistance to clubroot disease (Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin) in Brassica rapa L. PLoS One 8; Article e54745

Hirai M, T Harada, N Kubo, M Tsukada, K Suwabe, S Matsumoto (2004). A novel locus for clubroot resistance in brassica rapa and its linkage markers. Theor Appl Genet 108:639643

Howard RJ, SE Strelkov, MW Harding (2010). Clubroot of cruciferous crops – new perspectives on an old disease. Can J Plant Pathol 32:4357

Karling JS (1942). The Plasmodiophorales, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, USA

Kato T, K Hatakeyama, N Fukino, S Matsumoto (2012). Identificaiton of a clubroot resistance locus conferring resistance to a Plasmodiophora brassicae classified into pathotype group 3 in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L). Breed Sci 62:282287

Lee JE, JS Kang, YW Ki, JH Park, IC Shin, HC Koh (2012). Fluazinam targets mitochondrial complex I to induce reactive oxygen species-dependent cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. Neurochem Intl 60:773‒781

Lee SO, GJ Choi, YH Choi, KS Jang, JC Kim (2008). Isolation and characterization of endophytic actinomycetes from Chinese cabbage roots as antagonists to Plasmodiophora brassicae. Microbiol Biotechnol 18:1741‒1746

Li Q, XQ Shen, XC Geng, L Li (2012). Separate inoculation of single resting spores and identification of Plasmodiophora brassicae races. Plant Prot 38:95101

Liu F, LH Zhang, GH Ji (2013). Identification of physiological race of Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan and Tibet. Chin Veg 20:77‒81

Lv B, Y Wang, H Xai, Z Yao, C Jiang (2018). Differences in effects of different amendments on growth and soil fertility of Chinese cabbage in yellow brown soil and red soil. Sci Agric Sin 51:4306‒4315

Mcgrann GRD, T Yoxall, LJ Paterson, JMG Taylor, IG Birmpilis, DR Walters, ND Havis (2017). Control of light leaf spot and clubroot in brassica crops using defence elicitors. Eur J Plant Pathol 148:447461

Peng G, D Pageau, SE Strelkov, BD Gossen, S Hwang, R Lahlali (2015). A >2-year crop rotation reduces resting spores of Plasmodiophora brassicae in soil and the impact of clubroot on canola. Eur J Agron 70:78‒84

Peng SS, ZH Ren, XL Huang, MJ Liu, LF Sun, EM Liu (2013). Physiological race identification on clubroot of cruciferous crops caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in Hunan. J Changj Veg 6:4649

Sakamoto K, A Saito, N Hayashida, G Taguchi, E Matsumoto (2008). Mapping of isolate-specific QTLs for clubroot resistance in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. sspp. pekinensis). Theor Appl Genet 117:759767

Saravanan T, M Muthusamy, T Marimuthu (2003). Development of integrated approach to manage the fusarial wilt of banana. Crop Prot 22:11171123

Shen XQ, K Nie, Q Wu, YG Zhang, XH Meng (2009). Initial research report on differentiation identification of Chinese cabbage clubroot main physiological races. Chin Veg 1:5962

Suo H, LZ Chen, H Xu, B Song, XX Fan, XH Yuan, CZ He (2015). Research progress in clubroot of crucifers. J Anhui Agric Sci 126:115‒117

Suwabe K, H Tsukazaki, H Iketani, K Hatakeyama, M Fujimura, T Nunome, H Fukuoka, S Matsumoto, M Hirai (2003). Identification of two loci for resistance to clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae woronin) in Brassica rapa L. Theor Appl Genet 107:997‒1002

Tan C, YL Yue (2013). Identification of different Chinese cabbage [Brassica campestris L. sspp. pekinensis (Lour) Olsson] varieties resistance to clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae). Chin Veg 8:91‒94


Ueno H, E Matsumoto, D Aruga, S Kitagawa, H Matsumura, N Hayashida (2012). Molecular characterization of the CRa gene conferring clubroot resistance in Brassica rapa. Plant Mol Biol 80:621629

Wang SM, L Yin, T Shen, H Yang, B Shen (2016). Biological characteristics of Streptomyces albospinus CT205 and its biocontrol potential against cucumber fusarium wilt. Biocont Sci Technol 26:951963

Webster MA, GR Dixon (1991). Calcium, pH and inoculum concentration influencing colonization by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Mycol Res 95:6473

Williams PH (1966). A system for the determination of races of Plasmodiophora brassicae that infect cabbage and rutabaga. Phytopathology 56:624626

Yin JL, ZY Qian, YF Zheng, CX Zhao, YL Yue (2018). Physiological race identification of Plasmodiophora brassicae and screening of resistant source in Chinese cabbage at Yingjiang County. Chin Veg 8:55‒57

Yuan Q, IS Druzhinina, XY Pan, ZL Yuan (2016). Microbially mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 34:12451259

Zheng J, XL Wang, Xiao Y, SQ Wei, D Wang, Y Huang, WM Wang, H Yang (2019). Specificgenes identified in pathotype 4 of the clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae. Plant Dis 103:495503