Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan and its Resistant Sources in
Chinese Cabbage
Xueyu Han1†, Junlong Yin1,2†, Ikram Ullah1, Enzhu Luo1
and Yanling Yue1*
1College of Landscape and
Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2Chinese Academy of Tropical
Agricultural Sciences, Proving Ground, Danzhou 571737, China
*For correspondence:
yanling-yue@126.com; 2217714953@qq.com
†Contributed equally to this work and are
co-first authors
Received 01 August 2020; Accepted 02 January 2021; Published 25 March
2021
Abstract
The Williams differential system was employed for pathotype
identification of 34 Plasmodiophora
brassicae root samples collected from Yunnan Province and pathotypes 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14 were detected. Pathotype 4 was
dominant with 70.59% of all the samples in Yunnan. The distribution of the P.
brassicae pathotypes was mapped. Resistance to P. brassicae
(clubroot disease) was investigated in 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars and it was
found that the cultivar Shangpin had multiple
resistances and was immune while Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were resistant to P. brassicae. These cultivars can
be used by farmers as sources of resistance to P. brassicae, to aid them
in reducing disease in their crops. Seven known clubroot-resistant genes were
detected in the 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars. CRa and CRb were
found to be the most resistant to P. brassicae pathotype
4. Beisheng CR12 was resistant to pathotypes 1, 4, 10 and 14, but did not carry any known resistance genes, which
indicated that unknown resistant genes were present. This study will lay the
foundation for the control of clubroot disease and promote disease-resistant
breeding of Chinese cabbage. © 2021 Friends Science
Publishers
Keywords: Clubroot; Differential hosts; Plasmodiophora brassicae; Resistance
identification
Introduction
Clubroot,
caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae (P. brassicae), is an obligate
parasitic soil-borne disease of plants causing 25–60% of yield losses in
crucifer crops annually (Faggian et al. 1999; Howard et al. 2010;
Suo et al. 2015). P. brassicae infects the roots, causing swelling or
formation of galls on the roots. The distorted root reduces water and nutrient
uptake and leaf heads fail to develop (Faggian et al. 1999). Clubroot
was first reported in 1737 on the west coast of the Mediterranean Sea and
southern Europe (Karling 1942). In Asia, it was first reported in Taiwan,
China (1936) and then spread to Japan and Korea. At present, there are reports
of clubroot occurrence in the Northeast, Southwest, Shandong and the upper and
middle reaches of the Yangtze River in China (Suo et al. 2015). The
resting spores of P. brassicae can survive for
more than a decade within the soil (Karling 1942), even if the
cruciferous crops were no longer cultivated. Once a suitable host is available
for infection, the resting spores activate and invade the roots, and additional resting
spores are released after root decomposition, thus threatening the sustainable
production of cruciferous vegetables (Fei et al. 2015). Some measures have been taken to control this
pathogen in infested fields. Crop rotation is commonly used to prevent the
spread of clubroot disease (Howard et al. 2010), however, this
method is not a practical way to eradicate spores (Peng et al. 2015).
Soil amendments with lime have also been considered as an effective management
strategy to reduce clubroot infestation, by increasing soil pH (Lv et al.
2018). However, the repetitive use of lime destroys the soil structure,
ultimately affecting sustainable production (Webster and Dixon 1991). Fluazinam, a synthetic fungicide, has been
shown to control P. brassicae (Howard et al. 2010; Yuan
et al. 2016), however, improper use of the soil and plant residues
greatly affects human health and environmental safety (Lee et al. 2012).
Endophytic actinomycetes isolated from the roots of Chinese cabbage can
effectively control clubroot (Lee et al. 2008), but the activity against
P. brassicae is susceptible to soil environmental
conditions, and their field efficacy is inconsistent and often ineffective
(Saravanan et al. 2003; Mcgrann et al. 2017).
Wang et al. (2016) found that the Streptomyces
albospinus CT205, proved to be effective
in preventing clubroot disease, although environmental and climatic factors
severely affect its performance. Biocontrol agents are expensive and, if not
applied properly, can lead to an increased production cost. Therefore, the
application of resistant varieties is considered to be one of the most
effective and environmentally friendly approaches for treating clubroot
disease.
Clubroot has
been present in Yunnan for approximately 30 years. It first appeared in the
Chenggong area of Kunming and has been identified in Chuxiong, Yuxi, Qujing,
Dali, and other areas. Yunnan is the main vegetable producing area in China,
and Chinese cabbage is an important export vegetable of Yunnan Province,
cultivated in an area of approximately 100 000 hm2 with a yield of
4.06 million. The soil contaminated by P. brassicae in the main
production regions accounts for approximately 20% of the total area and the
loss of crops is generally 20–40%, but can be up to 100%. Several resistant
Chinese cabbage varieties, such as CR Huimin, Kanggen 51 and Tiejia No.1, have
been developed and introduced (Tan and Yue 2013;
Yin et al. 2018), although
these studies are mostly directed at a single P. brassicae pathotype and
a single sampling site, lacking comprehensive evaluation of pathotype
differentiation, variety resistance and a suitable applied range in the
province. In order to fully understand the
distribution of clubroot in Yunnan Province, P. brassicae samples were
collected from 34 different clubroot growing areas in 2017–2019 and their pathotypes and
resistant cultivars of Chinese cabbage were identified, which would provide
useful information for farmers to prevent and control clubroot.
Materials and Methods
Plant pathogen materials
A total of 34
P. brassicae samples were collected from the main cruciferous vegetable
growing areas in Yunnan Province. The samples, along with collection sites and
hosts, are shown in Table 1. For pathotype identification of the 34 P.
brassicae samples, the hosts proposed by Williams, including two cabbage
cultivars Jersey Queen (JQ), Badger Shipper (BS) and two turnip cultivars
Laurentian (LT),
Wilhelmsburger (WB), were obtained from the Liaoning Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, China. Twenty-one Chinese cabbage-resistant varieties and the
susceptible control variety ‘83-1’were purchased from markets.
Preparation of the pathogen, plant inoculation and disease assessment
Resting
spores were extracted from samples of P. brassicae using the method described by
Zheng et al. (2019). The peat and resting spores were mixed evenly, with
1×107 spores per gram of pathogen soil. Peat, perlite, and
vermiculite with a volume ratio of 2:1:1 were mixed and packed in seedling
plugs with 72 holes, and 1.0 grams of pathogen soil was added to each hole.
Germinated seeds of Williams’ identified hosts, and 22 Chinese cabbage
varieties were sowed on pathogen soil, one seed per hole, and one seedling plug
per variety. They were fertilised with Hoagland nutrient solution in the
greenhouse (average night temperature 18°C and average day temperature 25°C). After 40 days of
inoculation, pathotypes of 34 P. brassicae were identified according to
the resistant and susceptible responses by Williams’ hosts (Williams
1996). The
severity of the club development on each plant was rated using a scale of 0, 1,
3, 5, 7 and 9, according to The Grading Standard for Clubroot Resistance of Brassicaceae
Crop Seedling Period, where 0 = no clubbing, 1 = one or a few small clubs on
the lateral roots, 3 = clubs on the main roots with diameters less than 2 times
that of the stem base, 5 = clubs on the main roots with diameters 2–3 times
that of the stem base, 7 = clubs on the main roots, with diameters 3–4 times
that of the stem base, and 9 = clubs on the main roots with diameters more than
four times that of the stem base, or the swollen root is blackening. The index
of disease (ID) was calculated using the following formula:
ID (%) = ∑ (n×0+n×1+n×3+n×5+n×7+n×9)/(N×9)
×100
where n is
the number of plants in each class, N is the total number of plants, and 0, 1,
3, 5, 7 and 9 are the symptom severity classes.
DNA extraction and primer design
The Plant
DNA Extraction Kit (http://www.bioteke.com/) was used to extract DNA from
the leaves of 22 Chinese cabbage varieties and 4 Williams’ hosts, according to
the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers for disease-resistant genes were
designed based on published molecular marker sequences of CR loci: Crr1 (Suwabe
et al. 2003), Crr2 (Suwabe et al. 2003), Crr3 (Hirai
et al. 2004), CRa (Ueno et al. 2012), CRb (Hatakeyama et al.
2013), CRc (Ueno et al. 2012) and CRk (Ueno et al.
2012). The list of primers used is listed in Table 2.
PCR reaction procedure and gel
electrophoresis
Each locus
was amplified with 2 ng of template DNA in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 1 μL of each primer and 12.5 μL
of 2× PCR master mix (Takara, Japan). Thermal cycling conditions comprised
denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C
for 30s, annealing temperature of each primer at 61°C, 55.5°C, 55.5°C, 54.5°C, 57°C, 52.2°C, 49°C, 47°C for 30s and extension at 72°C for 30s followed by
extension at 72°C for 5 min in a BioTeke GeneAmp PCR
system. Amplified PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.5%
agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer, stained with EB (ethidium bromide) and
photographed.
Results
Identification of pathotypes
Table 1: Sampling codes, site and hosts of
34 Plasmodiophora brassicae
samples
Code |
Site |
Hosts |
Code |
Site |
Hosts |
Code |
Site |
Hosts |
Code |
Site |
Hosts |
P1 |
Songming |
Chinese cabbage |
P2 |
Songming |
Chinese cabbage |
P3 |
Yingjiang |
Chinese cabbage |
P4 |
Yuxi |
Chinese cabbage |
P5 |
Panlong |
Chinese cabbage |
P6 |
Lufeng |
Chinese cabbage |
P7 |
Yaoan |
Chinese cabbage |
P8 |
Nanhua |
Chinese cabbage |
P9 |
Chenggong |
Chinese cabbage |
P10 |
Yingjiang |
Chinese cabbage |
P11 |
Jianshui |
Chinese cabbage |
P12 |
Jianshui |
Chinese cabbage |
P13 |
Ludian |
Chinese cabbage |
P14 |
Yiliang |
Brassica oleracea |
P15 |
Yiliang |
Chinese cabbage |
P16 |
Luliang |
Chinese cabbage |
P17 |
Luliang |
Chinese cabbage |
P18 |
Qujing |
Chinese cabbage |
P19 |
Dali |
Chinese cabbage |
P20 |
Luquan |
Chinese cabbage |
P21 |
Ludian |
Chinese cabbage |
P22 |
Ludian |
Chinese cabbage |
P23 |
Xundian |
Cauliflower |
P24 |
Luliang |
Brassica oleracea |
P25 |
Anning |
Cauliflower |
P26 |
Wuding |
Chinese cabbage |
P27 |
Shilin |
Chinese cabbage |
P28 |
Jinning |
Chinese cabbage |
P29 |
Fumin |
Chinese cabbage |
P30 |
Xishan |
Chinese cabbage |
P31 |
Weishan |
Chinese cabbage |
P32 |
Tonghai |
Chinese cabbage |
P33 |
Xuanwei |
Chinese cabbage |
P34 |
Qiubei |
Chinese cabbage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
2: Primers
used for detection of clubroot resistant genes
Locus |
Primer name |
Primer sequences |
Product size/bp |
References |
Crr1 |
BRMS-088-FW BRM-088-RV |
TATCGGTACTGATTCGCTCTTCAAC ATCGGTTGTTATTTGAGAGCAGATT |
R263/S233 |
(Suwabe
et al. 2003). |
Crr2 |
BRMS-096-FW BRMS-096-RV |
AGTCGAGATCTCGTTCGTGTCTCCC TGAAGAAGGATTGAAGCTGTTGTTG |
R220/S189 |
(Suwabe
et al. 2003). |
Crr3 |
OPC11-2F OPC11-2R |
GTAACTTGGTACAGAACAGCATAG ACTTGTCTAATGAATGATCATGG |
R1300/S1000 |
(Hirai et al. 2004). |
CRa |
SC2930-T-FW SC2930-Q-FW SC2930-RV |
TAGACCTTTTTTTTGTCTTTTTTTTTAC CAGACTAGACTTTTTGTCATTTAGA CTAAGGCCATAGAAATCAGGTC |
R800 S800 |
(Ueno et al. 2012). |
CRb |
KBrH129J18R-FW KBrH129J18R-RV |
AGAGCAGAGTGAAACCAGAACT GTTTCAGTTCAGTCAGGTTTTTGCAG |
R254/S194 |
(Hatakeyama
et al. 2013). |
CRc |
B50-C9-FW B50-6R-FW B50-RV |
GATTCAATGCATTTCTCTCGAT AATGC ATTTTCGCTC AACC CGTATT ATATC TCTTT CTCCA TCCC |
R800 S800 |
(Ueno et al. 2012). |
CRk |
HC688-4-FW HC688-6-RV HC688-7-RV |
TCTCTG TATTGCGTTGACTG ATATGTTGAAGCCTATGTCT AAATATATGTGAAGTCTTATG ATC |
R1000 S1000 |
(Ueno et al. 2012). |
Table 3: Resistant
and susceptible response (severity based on a disease index, DI) of Williams’
differential hosts to collections of Plasmodiophora
brassicae from Yunnan Province, China
Code |
Williams hosts and disease index |
Pathotypes |
Code |
Williams hosts and disease index |
Pathotypes |
||||||||||||||
JQ |
DI |
BS |
DI |
LT |
DI |
WB |
DI |
JQ |
DI |
BS |
DI |
LT |
DI |
WB |
DI |
||||
P1 |
+ |
44 |
+ |
16 |
+ |
50 |
+ |
11 |
4 |
P18 |
+ |
13 |
+ |
26 |
+ |
7 |
- |
0 |
2 |
P2 |
+ |
21 |
+ |
33 |
+ |
28 |
+ |
30 |
4 |
P19 |
+ |
36 |
+ |
15 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
11 |
4 |
P3 |
+ |
85 |
+ |
44 |
+ |
41 |
+ |
54 |
4 |
P20 |
- |
0 |
+ |
11 |
- |
0 |
+ |
11 |
14 |
P4 |
+ |
26 |
+ |
61 |
+ |
11 |
+ |
35 |
4 |
P21 |
+ |
12 |
+ |
11 |
+ |
16 |
+ |
11 |
4 |
P5 |
+ |
56 |
+ |
74 |
+ |
59 |
+ |
42 |
4 |
P22 |
+ |
32 |
+ |
17 |
+ |
41 |
+ |
39 |
4 |
P6 |
+ |
19 |
+ |
31 |
+ |
40 |
- |
0 |
2 |
P23 |
+ |
17 |
+ |
11 |
- |
0 |
+ |
35 |
10 |
P7 |
+ |
26 |
+ |
44 |
+ |
47 |
+ |
22 |
4 |
P24 |
+ |
23 |
+ |
21 |
+ |
22 |
+ |
42 |
4 |
P8 |
+ |
31 |
+ |
34 |
+ |
46 |
+ |
19 |
4 |
P25 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
13 |
+ |
13 |
4 |
P9 |
+ |
31 |
+ |
11 |
+ |
19 |
+ |
35 |
4 |
P26 |
+ |
44 |
+ |
24 |
+ |
48 |
+ |
42 |
4 |
P10 |
+ |
40 |
+ |
35 |
+ |
27 |
+ |
17 |
4 |
P27 |
+ |
40 |
+ |
11 |
- |
0 |
+ |
11 |
10 |
P11 |
+ |
26 |
+ |
32 |
+ |
26 |
+ |
42 |
4 |
P28 |
+ |
43 |
+ |
17 |
+ |
11 |
+ |
18 |
4 |
P12 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
22 |
+ |
12 |
+ |
19 |
4 |
P29 |
+ |
28 |
+ |
46 |
+ |
34 |
+ |
38 |
4 |
P13 |
+ |
7 |
+ |
11 |
- |
0 |
+ |
35 |
10 |
P30 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
20 |
+ |
15 |
+ |
23 |
4 |
P14 |
+ |
21 |
- |
0 |
+ |
21 |
+ |
21 |
1 |
P31 |
+ |
38 |
+ |
19 |
- |
0 |
+ |
27 |
10 |
P15 |
+ |
15 |
+ |
15 |
+ |
22 |
+ |
24 |
4 |
P32 |
+ |
30 |
+ |
50 |
+ |
13 |
+ |
18 |
4 |
P16 |
- |
0 |
+ |
11 |
- |
0 |
+ |
11 |
14 |
P33 |
+ |
19 |
+ |
22 |
+ |
12 |
+ |
16 |
4 |
P17 |
+ |
25 |
+ |
24 |
- |
0 |
+ |
4 |
10 |
P34 |
+ |
21 |
+ |
18 |
+ |
14 |
+ |
17 |
4 |
Note: “+” represents susceptible
reaction, “-” represents resistant reaction
JQ, BS, LT, and WB are Williams
hosts (Jersey Queen, Badger Shipper, Laurentian, Wilhelmsburger).
P1-P34 are the 34 P. brassicae samples.
“Pathotypes”: the identified result of Pathotypes
The total
collection of 34 P. brassicae isolates was assessed. The susceptible or
resistant responses of Williams’ hosts to P.
Fig. 1: Amplification results of
different resistant genes
Note: M: Marker DL2000; 1–4: Williams Identification Hosts Badger Shipper, Jersey
Queen, Wilhelmsburger, Laurentian; 5: CK cultivars
83-1; 6–26: cultivars Chunqiushengen,
CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao, Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King,
CR mogen, Xinkanggen, CR gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin,
Shangpin CR527, Degao
CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin
CR523. A, B, C, (D, E), F, (G, H), (I, J): amplification results of Crr1
(BRMS-088), Crr2 (BRMS-096), Crr3 (OPC11-2), CRa
(SC2930-T, SC2930-Q), CRb (KBrH129J18R), CRc (B50-C9, B50-6R), CRk
(HC688-6, HC688-7) respectively. The product size of resistant and susceptible
is shown in Table 3
Fig. 2: Distribution of pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan
brassicae are shown
in Table 3. The 34 P. brassicae could be
classified into five pathotypes: pathotypes 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14. Among them, 24
samples were pathotype 4, accounting for 70.59% of the total samples (Table 3).
The results indicated that pathotype 4 was the predominant pathotype in Yunnan Province. All the Williams’ hosts (JQ, BS, LT and
WS) were susceptible to P. brassicae of pathotype 4, which confirmed that this variety had
the strongest pathogenicity of those studied.
The disease
index of hosts JQ, BS, LT and WS differed after inoculation with pathotype 4.
The disease index of JQ was 12 in P21 but reached 85 in P3, whereas the disease
index of BS was 11 in P9 and P21, but 74 in P5. Similarly, the results for LT
ranged from 11 to 59 and the disease index of WS ranged from 11 to 54 for
pathotype 4. This shows pathogenic diversity among P. brassicae of
pathotype 4 in Yunnan Province. The disease index of hosts was higher in P3 and
P5 than in others, indicating that the pathogenicity of P3 and P5 was stronger
than that of other P. brassicae of pathotype 4.
Diseases reaction of Chinese cabbage cultivars
We assessed
the disease responses of 22 Chinese cabbage cultivars to 34 P. brassicae
isolates (Table 4). The control variety (83-1) showed the
typical clubroot symptoms with all P. brassicae isolates, which
indicates that the method of inoculation was suitable. The other 21 Chinese
cabbage varieties exhibited different resistance responses to the 34 P.
brassicae isolates. Shangpin was immune to each of the 34 collections,
whereas the disease index of Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were less than
10, indicating strong resistance. From the resistance expression of cultivars
to pathotype 4, there were only three cultivars namely Shangpin, Shangpin CR527
and Shangpin CR523 that were immune to P5, less than the other varieties
included in pathotype 4, which shows that P5 was a stronger version of P.
brassicae. There were few sources which showed resistance to P5.
As shown in
Table 4, CR8, CR9, CR10, CR17,
CR18 and CR21 expressed immunity to P14 (pathotype 1). The disease indices of
CR2, CR3, CR5, CR13, CR14 and CR16 were lower than 10, indicating that they
were resistant to P14. CR17, CR18 and CR21 exhibited immunity, while CR1 and
CR10 were resistant to P6 and P18 (pathotype 2). CR9, CR17, CR18 and CR21 were
immune, and CR12 and CR16 were resistant to P13, P17, P23, P27 and P31
(pathotype 10). CR9, CR13, CR14, CR16, CR17, CR18, CR19 and CR21 showed
immunity, and CR1 and CR8 were resistant to P16 and P20 (pathotype 14).
Molecular markers for resistance
To
investigate the relationship between the clubroot-resistant varieties and known
CR resistance loci, PCR amplification of the seven known molecular markers was
applied for genotyping Williams’ hosts and the 22 cultivars.
The results
(Fig. 1, Table 5) indicated that LT contained the most disease-resistant genes:
Crr3, CRa, CRb, CRc and CRk. WB contained
three disease-resistant genes: CRa, CRb and CRk. Only the
resistant gene CRk was detected in the BS and JQ. Among the 21 tested
varieties, CR18 and CR21 contained four disease-resistant genes, heterozygous CRa
and CRk, homozygous CRb and CRc, which accounted for 9.52%
of the total tested varieties. CR17 was checked for three disease-resistant
genes, homozygous CRa, CRb and heterozygous CRk, which
accounted for 4.76%. CR5 was examined for two resistant genes, homozygous Crr2
and heterozygous CRk, accounting for 4.76%. CR15 contained two resistant
genes, heterozygous CRa and CRk, which accounted for 4.76%, and
CR7, CR9 and CR11 did not test for any disease-resistant genes, accounting for
14.29% of the total tested cultivars. The other cultivars contained only one
heterozygous CRk gene (61.9%).
Discussion
There are
few reports related to the study of pathotype differentiation of P.
brassicae in China, and only a few pathotypes have been detected, such as
pathotype 4 in areas of Shandong and Jilin Province and pathotypes 2, 4 and 11 in the Liaoning area (Shen et al. 2009). Pathotypes
7 and 11 have been reported in the Sichuan area (Chen et al. 2016), and
pathotypes 1, 4, 9 and 13 in the Hunan
area (Peng et al. 2013). The
clubroot in the Shandong, Jilin, Liaoning, Sichuan, and Hunan areas
could be explained by the cultivation of resistant varieties. In this
study, 5 pathotypes, pathotype 1, 2, 4, 10 and 14, were investigated in Yunnan Province and only Shangpin was determined as immune
to all pathotypes, indicating that P. brassicae in Yunnan is more
complex and pathogenic than in other areas in China.
Pathotypes of P. brassicae and their distribution in Yunnan are shown in Fig.
2.
Table
4: Resistant and susceptible response (severity based on a
disease index, DI) of 22 differential varieties to collections of Plasmodiophora brassicae
from Yunnan Province, China
Varieties |
83-1 |
CR1 |
CR2 |
CR3 |
CR4 |
CR5 |
CR6 |
CR7 |
CR8 |
CR9 |
CR10 |
CR11 |
CR12 |
CR13 |
CR14 |
CR15 |
CR16 |
CR17 |
CR18 |
CR19 |
CR20 |
CR21 |
|
P1 |
DI |
61 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
43 |
16 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
R |
S |
I |
R |
I |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
I |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
|
P2 |
DI |
57 |
31 |
4 |
5 |
70 |
5 |
15 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
57 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
23 |
5 |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
R |
I |
S |
S |
I |
I |
R |
S |
R |
|
P3 |
DI |
85 |
19 |
57 |
9 |
43 |
33 |
41 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
0 |
19 |
5 |
49 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
R |
S |
I |
S |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
|
P4 |
DI |
72 |
25 |
42 |
52 |
58 |
15 |
35 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
11 |
7 |
10 |
56 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
14 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P5 |
DI |
86 |
26 |
41 |
31 |
37 |
79 |
19 |
43 |
31 |
31 |
33 |
50 |
30 |
31 |
33 |
48 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
54 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P6 |
DI |
65 |
3 |
20 |
11 |
65 |
14 |
28 |
32 |
38 |
48 |
0 |
11 |
17 |
10 |
27 |
80 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
25 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P7 |
DI |
80 |
33 |
78 |
19 |
62 |
56 |
19 |
39 |
20 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
27 |
48 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
15 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
I |
S |
I |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P8 |
DI |
67 |
17 |
26 |
0 |
41 |
48 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
53 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
12 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
R |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P9 |
DI |
56 |
11 |
26 |
17 |
59 |
33 |
19 |
56 |
19 |
16 |
20 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
11 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
28 |
2 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
I |
I |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
R |
|
P10 |
DI |
72 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
46 |
16 |
16 |
32 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
29 |
33 |
6 |
7 |
41 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
13 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
S |
I |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P11 |
DI |
65 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
47 |
28 |
23 |
42 |
17 |
22 |
1 |
15 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
70 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
I |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
I |
R |
R |
I |
|
P12 |
DI |
76 |
9 |
13 |
0 |
31 |
29 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
29 |
37 |
4 |
11 |
51 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
I |
S |
S |
I |
S |
I |
R |
I |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P13 |
DI |
37 |
5 |
22 |
7 |
69 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
32 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
I |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P14 |
DI |
46 |
19 |
7 |
2 |
63 |
8 |
17 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
11 |
1 |
5 |
50 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
15 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P15 |
DI |
57 |
19 |
7 |
2 |
63 |
8 |
17 |
25 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
11 |
1 |
5 |
50 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
6 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
|
P16 |
DI |
67 |
8 |
19 |
0 |
72 |
11 |
14 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
26 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
I |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
I |
S |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P17 |
DI |
70 |
39 |
65 |
21 |
78 |
44 |
69 |
36 |
37 |
0 |
10 |
44 |
3 |
19 |
20 |
46 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
15 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P18 |
DI |
44 |
7 |
63 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
16 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
I |
I |
R |
R |
S |
R |
R |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
R |
S |
I |
|
P19 |
DI |
65 |
22 |
13 |
4 |
54 |
18 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
20 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
R |
I |
I |
|
P20 |
DI |
67 |
8 |
19 |
11 |
72 |
0 |
8 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
26 |
26 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P21 |
DI |
22 |
39 |
70 |
17 |
61 |
14 |
23 |
0 |
6 |
31 |
0 |
21 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
61 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
33 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
S |
R |
I |
R |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P22 |
DI |
72 |
2 |
27 |
28 |
67 |
44 |
14 |
36 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
42 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
17 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P23 |
DI |
37 |
5 |
22 |
7 |
69 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
32 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
R |
R |
R |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P24 |
DI |
67 |
24 |
37 |
29 |
33 |
5 |
13 |
7 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
0 |
57 |
19 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
61 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
R |
I |
R |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
S |
S |
I |
R |
S |
S |
I |
|
P25 |
DI |
33 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
17 |
2 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
6 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
I |
R |
S |
S |
R |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
|
P26 |
DI |
65 |
11 |
14 |
15 |
52 |
9 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
48 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
32 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
I |
I |
S |
R |
R |
I |
S |
I |
S |
S |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P27 |
DI |
57 |
31 |
24 |
4 |
56 |
12 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
24 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
I |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
R |
I |
|
P28 |
DI |
56 |
39 |
46 |
21 |
78 |
44 |
16 |
36 |
37 |
1 |
10 |
44 |
3 |
19 |
20 |
46 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
13 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
I |
R |
S |
S |
I |
|
P29 |
DI |
63 |
3 |
20 |
17 |
37 |
21 |
17 |
16 |
39 |
32 |
3 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
59 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
36 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
S |
I |
R |
S |
S |
I |
|
P30 |
DI |
52 |
6 |
42 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
17 |
0 |
R |
S |
R |
S |
R |
S |
S |
S |
I |
I |
R |
R |
S |
R |
R |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
S |
I |
|
P31 |
DI |
46 |
16 |
34 |
5 |
58 |
14 |
8 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
44 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
I |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
R |
S |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
|
P32 |
DI |
73 |
16 |
63 |
2 |
62 |
24 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
12 |
1 |
34 |
58 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
I |
I |
I |
S |
S |
R |
S |
S |
R |
I |
I |
R |
R |
I |
|
P33 |
DI |
35 |
22 |
8 |
3 |
18 |
13 |
5 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
S |
R |
S |
R |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
|
P34 |
DI |
38 |
26 |
4 |
7 |
24 |
19 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
9 |
0 |
R |
S |
S |
R |
R |
S |
S |
R |
S |
R |
I |
R |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
I |
I |
I |
S |
R |
I |
Note: Disease index<10 meaned
Resistant (R), Disease index≥10 meaned
susceptible (S), Disease index=0 meaned immune (I). From CR1 to CR21: Chunqiushenggen, CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao, Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12,
Chinese cabbage King, CR Mogen, Xinkanggen, CR Gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Degao CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin CR523
Clubroot
disease was detrimental in Kunming and its surrounding areas, Fumin, Anning,
Jinning, Songming and Yiliang. Kunming became a disease centre, spreading
outward to some areas of Chuxiong, Dali, Dehong, Lijiang, Honghe and Qujing,
and to counter this expansion, we propose prevention and control strategies for
clubroot disease in Yunnan Province.
Although planting disease-resistant Chinese cabbage varieties or
non-cruciferous crops in clubroot disease areas can reduce the number of P. brassicae spores
in the soil and avoid the occurrence of clubroot, we need to invoke quarantine
and disinfection of the seeds and seedlings in the adjacent areas of the
disease area, avoiding soil pollution caused by P. brassicae from clubroot disease areas and
preventing the expansion of the disease.
Table 5: Identification results of molecular markers
Code |
Cultivars |
Resistant site |
||||||
Crr1 |
Crr2 |
Crr3 |
CRa |
CRb |
CRc |
CRk |
||
1 |
BS |
\ |
- |
\ |
- |
- |
\ |
+ |
2 |
JQ |
\ |
- |
\ |
- |
- |
\ |
+ |
3 |
WB |
\ |
- |
- |
± |
+ |
- |
+ |
4 |
LT |
- |
- |
+ |
± |
+ |
+ |
+ |
5 |
83-1(CK) |
- |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
6 |
CR1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
7 |
CR2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
8 |
CR3 |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
9 |
CR4 |
- |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
10 |
CR5 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
11 |
CR6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
12 |
CR7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
CR8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
14 |
CR9 |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
CR10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
16 |
CR 11 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
CR12 |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
18 |
CR13 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
19 |
CR14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
20 |
CR15 |
- |
- |
- |
± |
- |
- |
± |
21 |
CR16 |
\ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
22 |
CR17 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
± |
23 |
CR18 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
± |
24 |
CR19 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
25 |
CR20 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
± |
26 |
CR21 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
± |
Note: “+” Homozygous persistent site; “-” Homozygous susceptible site; “±”
Heterozygous resistant site; “\” no site. From CR1 to CR21: Chunqiushenggen,
CR65, Tianci, Jinfu baby
cabbage, Guizu, Degaorongyao,
Kanggen 911, Taineng CR119,
Beisheng CR12, Chinese cabbage King, CR Mogen, Xinkanggen, CR Gaokangwang, Kangbingwang CR117, Guoshen
CR167, Shenggen No.1, Shangpin,
Shangpin CR527, Degao
CR117, Tiejia No.1, Shangpin
CR523
Table 6: Resistance varieties of different Pathotypes
Race |
Cultivars |
Race 1 |
Taineng CR119, Beisheng CR12,
Chinese cabbage King, Shangpin, Shangpin
CR527, Degao CR117, ShangpinCR523 |
Race 2 |
Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Shangpin CR523 |
Race 4 |
Shangpin |
Race 10 |
Beisheng CR12, Shangpin, Shangpin CR527, Shangpin CR523 |
Race 14 |
Beisheng CR12, CR Gaokangwang,
Kangbingwang CR117, Shenggen
NO.1, Shangpin, Shangpin
CR527, Degao CR117, Shangpin
CR523 |
The
pathogenicity of P. brassicae in Yunnan Province has
changed over the past decade. The P. brassicae found in Lufeng was
pathotype 12 in 2013 (Liu et al. 2013), but is now pathotype 2. Both of
the 2 P. brassicae samples from Songming
were pathotype 4 in our study, but pathotype 7 was identified in 2016 (Chen et
al. 2016). Pathotype 2 had higher pathogenicity than 12, and pathotype 4
was higher than pathotype
7. These results indicate that clubroot disease in Lufeng and Songming had
become more robust over time. Pathogenicity of pathotype 4 was the highest
among all pathotypes. However, only 3 cultivars: Shangpin, Shangpin CR523 and
Shangpin CR527, were resistant to all types of pathotype 4 in Yunnan; the other
varieties expressed either immune, resistant or susceptible responses depending
on the type of pathogen 4. The responses of the same cultivar to 24 samples of
pathotype 4 were different, which indicated its pathogenicity differences and
complexity. It was reported by Li et al. (2012) that they had
successfully isolated several pathotypes (2, 4, 8 and 11) from pathotype 4
samples in Shenyang Province by separating single resting spores. Their results
led to the assumption that pathotype 4 samples in Yunnan may be composed of
different types of P. brassicae. At present, these types cannot be
clearly distinguished using the Williams system. Therefore, a more accurate
identification method is crucial for the prevention and control of clubroot,
and for clubroot-resistant breeding.
The
application of resistant varieties is the most economical, effective and
sustainable measure for the control of clubroot. In this study, Shangpin,
Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 were immune to pathotypes 1, 2, 10 and 14 of P.
brassicae, however, only Shangpin was immune to
all of the types of pathotype 4 of P.
brassicae (Table 6). These results provide a reference for the
selection of Chinese cabbage cultivars in the clubroot disease area of Yunnan
Province. They could also provide germplasm for the breeding of
clubroot-resistant Chinese cabbage.
Some
molecular markers of clubroot resistance have been identified. CRa and CRb
are alleles or closely linked disease resistance loci on the A03 chromosome (Kato et al. 2012; Hatakeyama et al.
2017). Chinese cabbage with CRa and CRb could be resistant to
pathotype 4 of P. brassicae (Saravanan et al. 2003) CRa and CRb
loci were detected in Shangpin, Shangpin CR527 and Shangpin CR523 in this
study. Shangpin, was only detected in three resistant markers. These three
markers were also detected in Shangpin CR523 and Shangpin CR527, but their
resistance was lower, indicating that there are still undiscovered resistance
sites in Shangpin, and need further research. According to Sakamoto et al.
(2008), Crr3 and CRk are two independent resistance loci on
chromosome A03, with a genetic distance of 7 cM. However, in this experiment,
the two resistance loci were quite different. The Crr3 locus was not
detected in the 21 tested varieties, but CRk loci were widely detected,
even in the susceptible control ‘83-1’. It is suspected that CRk loci
may not be closely related to disease resistance genes.
Beisheng
CR12 (CR9) was immune to P1-P4, P12-P17, P22, P23, P25, P27 and P31-P34,
relating to pathotypes 1, 4, 10 and 14 (Table 3), but did not carry any known
resistance genes (Table 5), indicating that unknown resistant genes were
present. Beisheng CR12 would be a potential genetic resource for developing
resistant markers or genes to prevent clubroot.
Conclusion
P.
brassicae was more
complex and pathogenic in Yunnan than in
other areas of China. The two different strategies and three cultivars were suggested to prevent and control
clubroot. Further
studies are needed to find the potential genes resistant-clubroot in cultivars Beisheng CR12 and Shangpin.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially
by the Key Research and Development Project of Yunnan Province (No. 2018BB021).
We are thankful to the Vegetable Industry Technology System Experimental
Stations in Jianshui, Dehong, Tonghai, Luliang, Kunming and Ludian for
collection of P. brassicae root samples.
Author Contributions
Designed the experiments: YLY.
Performed the experiments: JLY, XYH and EZL.Analyzed the data: XYH and JLY.
Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: IU and EZL. Wrote the paper: XYH
and YLY.
Conflict of Interest
We, the authors, declare no conflict
of interest of any kind among ourselves of the institutions where the work was
done
Data Availability Declaration
All data reported in this article
are available with the corresponding author and will be produced on demand
References
Chen J, XS Ren, HY Song, CQ Li, TC Yuan, J Si (2016).
Identification of races of Plasmodiophora brassicae from four different
regions and resistance identification of new cabbage cross combinations. J
Southwest Univ 38:67‒72
Faggian R, SR Bulman, AC Lawrie, IJ
Porter (1999). Specific polymerase chain reaction primers for the detection of Plasmodiophora
brassicae in soil and water. Phytopathology 89:392‒397
Fei WX, SF Wang, BC Hu, QS Li, SM Hou, SB Rong, XY Wu (2015). Control effect of different fungicides on clubroot and
yield loss caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in Brassica napus.
Plant Prot 41:201‒204
Hatakeyama K, T Niwa, T Kato, T Ohara,
T Kakizaki, S Matsumoto (2017). The tandem repeated organization of NB–LRR
genes in the clubroot-resistant CRb locus in Brassica rapa L. Mol
Genet Genomics 292:397‒405
Hatakeyama K, K Suwabe, RN Tomita, T Kato, T Nunome, H
Fukuoka, S Matsumoto (2013). Identification and characterization of Crr1a,
a gene for resistance to clubroot disease (Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin) in Brassica rapa L. PLoS One 8; Article
e54745
Hirai M, T Harada, N Kubo, M Tsukada, K
Suwabe, S Matsumoto (2004). A novel locus for clubroot resistance in brassica
rapa and its linkage markers. Theor Appl Genet 108:639‒643
Howard RJ, SE Strelkov, MW Harding
(2010). Clubroot of cruciferous crops – new perspectives on an old disease. Can
J Plant Pathol 32:43‒57
Karling JS (1942). The Plasmodiophorales, 2nd edn. Springer,
New York, USA
Kato T, K Hatakeyama, N Fukino, S Matsumoto
(2012). Identificaiton of a clubroot resistance locus conferring resistance to
a Plasmodiophora brassicae classified into pathotype group 3 in Chinese
cabbage (Brassica rapa L).
Breed Sci 62:282‒287
Lee JE, JS
Kang, YW Ki, JH Park, IC Shin, HC Koh (2012). Fluazinam targets mitochondrial
complex I to induce reactive oxygen species-dependent cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y
cells. Neurochem Intl 60:773‒781
Lee SO, GJ Choi, YH Choi, KS Jang, JC Kim (2008). Isolation
and characterization of endophytic actinomycetes from Chinese cabbage roots as
antagonists to Plasmodiophora
brassicae. Microbiol Biotechnol 18:1741‒1746
Li Q, XQ Shen, XC Geng, L Li (2012). Separate inoculation
of single resting spores and identification of Plasmodiophora brassicae races.
Plant Prot 38:95‒101
Liu F, LH Zhang, GH Ji (2013).
Identification of physiological race of Plasmodiophora brassicae in
Yunnan and Tibet. Chin Veg 20:77‒81
Lv B, Y Wang, H Xai, Z Yao, C Jiang (2018). Differences in effects of different amendments on growth
and soil fertility of Chinese cabbage in yellow brown soil and red soil. Sci
Agric Sin 51:4306‒4315
Mcgrann GRD, T Yoxall, LJ Paterson, JMG Taylor, IG Birmpilis, DR Walters, ND Havis (2017). Control of light leaf spot
and clubroot in brassica crops using defence elicitors. Eur J Plant Pathol
148:447‒461
Peng G, D Pageau, SE Strelkov, BD Gossen, S Hwang, R Lahlali (2015). A >2-year crop rotation reduces resting
spores of Plasmodiophora brassicae
in soil and the impact of clubroot on canola. Eur J Agron 70:78‒84
Peng SS, ZH Ren, XL Huang, MJ Liu, LF Sun, EM Liu (2013).
Physiological race identification on clubroot of cruciferous crops caused by Plasmodiophora
brassicae in Hunan. J Changj Veg 6:46‒49
Sakamoto K, A Saito, N Hayashida, G Taguchi, E Matsumoto
(2008). Mapping of isolate-specific QTLs for clubroot resistance in Chinese
cabbage (Brassica rapa L.
sspp. pekinensis). Theor
Appl Genet 117:759‒767
Saravanan T, M Muthusamy, T Marimuthu (2003). Development
of integrated approach to manage the fusarial wilt of banana. Crop Prot 22:1117‒1123
Shen XQ, K Nie, Q Wu, YG Zhang,
XH Meng (2009). Initial research report on
differentiation identification of Chinese cabbage clubroot main physiological
races. Chin
Veg 1:59‒62
Suo H, LZ Chen, H Xu, B Song, XX Fan, XH Yuan, CZ He (2015). Research progress in clubroot of crucifers. J Anhui Agric
Sci 126:115‒117
Suwabe K, H Tsukazaki, H Iketani, K Hatakeyama, M Fujimura, T Nunome, H
Fukuoka, S Matsumoto, M Hirai (2003). Identification of two loci for resistance
to clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae woronin) in Brassica rapa L.
Theor Appl Genet 107:997‒1002
Tan C, YL Yue (2013).
Identification of different Chinese cabbage [Brassica campestris L. sspp. pekinensis (Lour) Olsson] varieties
resistance to clubroot (Plasmodiophora
brassicae). Chin Veg 8:91‒94
Ueno H, E Matsumoto, D Aruga, S Kitagawa, H Matsumura, N
Hayashida (2012). Molecular characterization of the CRa
gene conferring clubroot resistance in Brassica rapa. Plant Mol Biol 80:621‒629
Wang SM, L Yin, T Shen, H Yang, B Shen (2016). Biological
characteristics of Streptomyces
albospinus CT205 and its biocontrol potential against cucumber fusarium
wilt. Biocont Sci Technol 26:951‒963
Webster MA, GR Dixon (1991).
Calcium, pH and inoculum concentration influencing colonization by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Mycol Res 95:64‒73
Williams PH (1966). A system for the
determination of races of Plasmodiophora brassicae that infect cabbage
and rutabaga. Phytopathology 56:624‒626
Yin JL, ZY Qian, YF Zheng, CX Zhao, YL Yue (2018).
Physiological race identification of Plasmodiophora brassicae and
screening of resistant source in Chinese cabbage at Yingjiang County. Chin
Veg 8:55‒57
Yuan Q, IS Druzhinina, XY Pan, ZL Yuan (2016). Microbially
mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline
agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 34:1245‒1259
Zheng J, XL Wang, Xiao Y, SQ Wei, D Wang, Y Huang, WM Wang, H Yang (2019).
Specificgenes identified in pathotype 4 of the clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophora
brassicae. Plant Dis 103:495‒503